Deploy to brick-host instead of cube-host
CI / check (push) Successful in 19s
CI / deploy (push) Failing after 5m1s

cube.local and brick.local swapped IPs and brick is now the deploy
target — rename the native runner label everywhere it's referenced.
This commit is contained in:
randy committed 2026-09-12 01:15:09 +02:00
1 parent 78362d51f2
commit 0080ac6170
2 files changed
+7 -7

No files matched your search

+4 -4
View File
@@ -34,13 +34,13 @@ jobs:
run: find public/js -name "*.js" -print0 | xargs -0 -n1 node --check
# Handled by a separate, native (non-Docker) runner registered with the
# single "cube-host" label (see docs/deployment.adoc) — it runs directly
# single "brick-host" label (see docs/deployment.adoc) — it runs directly
# on the server, so it has podman/git/etc. from the host, no socket/bind
# mount tricks needed. The Docker-based runner keeps handling `check`.
deploy:
needs: check
if: github.event_name == 'push' && github.ref == 'refs/heads/main'
runs-on: cube-host
runs-on: brick-host
steps:
# Not actions/checkout@v4: keeping this plain-git checkout from when
# the job ran in a Node-less container — no reason to add a Node
@@ -114,14 +114,14 @@ jobs:
# layers (apt-get/bundle install) as cache — unlike explicitly
# removing the image first, which would delete that cache along with
# it. sudo is needed since the unit is root's, not gitea-runner's own
# (gitea-runner has passwordless sudo for this on cube-host).
# (gitea-runner has passwordless sudo for this on brick-host).
- name: Deploy
run: sudo systemctl restart podman-compose@maptool.service
# systemctl restart above only confirms the process forked
# (Type=simple, no readiness protocol) — not that `podman compose up
# --build` actually finished and Puma is answering. Polls the health
# endpoint (cube-host itself, same machine the container's port is
# endpoint (brick-host itself, same machine the container's port is
# published on) instead of trusting that — checking for this
# deploy's own revision, not just any 200, so a stuck old container
# that never got torn down can't pass as a successful deploy of the
+3 -3
View File
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ against the Gitea instance:
`ubuntu-latest`/`ubuntu-24.04`/`ubuntu-22.04` — runs the `check` job
in a fresh, isolated container per job, same as before.
* A dedicated native runner, installed directly on the host (no Docker
around it), label `cube-host` — runs only the `deploy` job.
around it), label `brick-host` — runs only the `deploy` job.
They're separate because the Docker-based runner's jobs (whether in
its usual isolated per-job containers, or tried directly inside its
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ label:
----
runner:
labels:
- "cube-host"
- "brick-host"
----
The `host` scheme means jobs run directly via the runner process's own
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ webhook simply won't receive that session; nothing breaks.
== CI deploy job
`.gitea/workflows/ci.yml`'s `deploy` job runs after `check` passes, only
on a push to `main`, with `runs-on: cube-host`:
on a push to `main`, with `runs-on: brick-host`:
. Checks out the repo with plain `git` (`fetch` + `checkout`,
authenticated via a one-off `http.extraHeader`) rather than