Revert check/renovate to ubuntu-latest — brick-build's image has no Node
CI / check (push) Successful in 19s
CI / deploy (push) Successful in 12s

brick-build's job container (opensuse/leap:16.0) has no Node.js, and
every step in check/renovate (checkout, setup-ruby, setup-node) is a
JS-based Action that needs it just to start — both runs since the
brick-build switch failed immediately, and deploy never ran because it
depends on check passing. ubuntu-latest is shared with "Gitea Runner on
Cube" (not pinned to this specific machine), but that's fine: only
deploy (a unique label held by just brick's native runner) actually
needs to land on a specific box.
This commit is contained in:
randy committed 2026-09-12 21:39:21 +02:00
1 parent 21988c61da
commit c894706140
3 files changed
+22 -5

No files matched your search

+10 -3
View File
@@ -7,9 +7,16 @@ MapTool deploys as a Podman container (via `podman compose`, driven by a
the Gitea Actions runners run on. Two separate runners are registered
against the Gitea instance:
* The existing Docker-based runner (`gitea/runner:3`), label
`brick-build` — runs the `check` and `renovate` jobs in a fresh,
isolated container per job, same as before.
* The existing Docker-based runner (`gitea/runner:3`), labels
`ubuntu-latest`/`ubuntu-24.04`/`ubuntu-22.04` — runs the `check` and
`renovate` jobs in a fresh, isolated container per job, same as
before. It's also registered under `brick-build`, but that label's
job container (`opensuse/leap:16.0`) has no Node.js, which every step
in `check`/`renovate` needs (they're JS-based Actions) — until that
image gets Node, or the label points elsewhere, `check`/`renovate`
stay on `ubuntu-latest`. That label is shared with "Gitea Runner on
Cube" too, so a `check`/`renovate` run isn't pinned to this specific
machine — harmless, since only `deploy` actually needs a specific box.
* A dedicated native runner, installed directly on the host (no Docker
around it), label `brick-host` — runs only the `deploy` job.